|
28/11/2008
RPSGB: White paper should not have included dispensing GP changes Changes to dispensing doctor regulations should not have been included in the pharmacy white paper, the RPSGB’s English Pharmacy Board (EPB) has said.
Howard Duff, the Society's director for
But, in submitting the EPB's consultation response to the DH, Mr Duff added: “It is disappointing that the issue of dispensing doctors is included in the paper, as it detracts from the core issue of progressing important pharmacy services.”
Plans in the white paper prevent practices located too close to pharmacies from dispensing. The plans have attracted widely-publicised local opposition from dispensing doctors.
Where dispensing practices were needed, their dispensing activity must be subject to the same regulation as that in pharmacies to ensure patient safety, the EPB told the DH.
More detail on the quality of PCTs’ Pharmaceutical Needs Assessments (PNAs) were needed, the EPB also said in its consultation response, before they could be used to assess pharmacy applications. But the EPB supported market entry based on needs assessment “in principle”, it added. |
RELATED ARTICLES Xrayser: Looking for a better return on my money > What the papers say: people turning to surgery to fight the flab > Pharmacy tutor avoids being struck off over exam fixing > PCT cuts beyond our control, warns PSNC > Jennifer Richardson: The first cut is the deepest > What the papers say: migraines linked to heart disease, and record STIs > Pharmacy PR campaign kicks off with NHS Portsmouth > What the papers say: leafy vegetables could cut prevent diabetes > RPSGB calls up 15 staff for CPD review > RPSGB boards slam proposed GPhC fees > |
||