Reward GPs to commission health services, says report

Chris Chapman


Pharmacists should be part of a team of local experts to commission health services, the NHS Alliance has said – but only if led by doctors driven by incentives.

 

The commissioning taskforces, labelled Local Clinical Partnerships (LCPs), are the key recommendation of a report suggesting a replacement for practice-based commissioning (PBC) by the NHS Alliance and Nuffield Trust. Under the proposals LCPs would have budgets to commission local health services and would be mostly “doctor-led”, with “active involvement” from pharmacists and nurses.

 

The rethink of primary care commissioning was necessary after the lack of consistency in services created by PBC, report co-author and NHS Alliance director of PBC Julie Wood said.

 

However, “organisational and personal incentives” would be needed to ensure GPs engage with the scheme, Ms Wood added.

 

When asked why GPs should lead rather than be part of a team, a spokeswoman for the NHS Alliance said there was “strong evidence” that commissioning worked best when doctors played a central role, but that the emphasis of the report was on involving a “diverse range of professionals”. 



Comment on this Story


1  Response to this Story

1.  Posted by shelton magunje, On 02/12/2009 08:24

Typical! it just shows that we did not learn anything from the experience we had with the 'new GP contract a few years ago'. GPs are not a charity, they are businesses, any incentive they are offered will just be manipulated for their own selfish ends.

'Active involvement!?' havent we heard that term for the past 100years!? Why would the GP want to 'actively involve' the pharmacist who will then want a share of the 'incentives'? Does anyone out there know how many 'pharmacist supplementary prescribers' are actively prescribing anything!?, one pharmacist i know is infact being sued by the independent proprietor who sponsored him for the course with the hope (or is it hype) that it would bring new revenues which never came. His local GP asked him to justify why the GP should use him and not a cheaper nurse whose wages he can just include in the 'costs of business'? IF its gonna be a team effort then all team members should be equal players, otherwise the public will never realise the full intended benefits of any new schemes to be commisioned!

just a thought by a naive pharmacist, maybe!?


Top







     Terms and Conditions   |    About Us   |    © Chemist+Druggist   |    Contact Us   |    Sitemap   |    Subscribe to C+D magazine – the best read news weekly for UK community pharmacists   |    Subscribe to email alerts   |    C+D Data   |    SearchMedica   |