Email
11 May 2011

Details of New Medicine Service and targeted MURs revealed

Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Bindu Bhatt, Superintendent
Posted on 12 May 2011.
Once again the PSNC is signinig us up for lots of extra paperwork without delivering any new funding. On top of existing requirements we will now have to write another series of SOPs with which the PCTs will come and examine us and take up more of our time. I wonder if thisis going to be the straw that breaks the Camel's Back.
Sign in to vote.
Top
Sultan Dajani, Community pharmacist
Posted on 12/05/11 15:12 in reply to Bindu Bhatt.
Looks very bureaucratic and smells like a nightmare!
Sign in to vote.
Top
S S Locum, Locum pharmacist
Posted on 12 May 2011.
Agree with R K.Multiples are the biggest culprits,demanding at least some MUR's are done everyday.Locums are forced to do MUR's otherwise.....
Tha main pharmacists or the pharmacist managers get the pat on their backs and may be a good bonus at the end of the year where as the locums get -" either do it or else..."
Thats Life !!!!
Sign in to vote.
Top
Jacques Gholam, Community pharmacist
Posted on 13 May 2011.
Once again the supine PSNC accede to more bureaucratic claptrap, more clinical governance? whistleblowing? what next? snooping? big brother? And just what is the GPhC, the RPS and the NPA doing to stop the onwards march of more and more bureaucracy? For Goodness sakes why can't we just be allowed to get on with our jobs, they are called patients! Remember them?
Sign in to vote.
Top
Philip Howard, Locum pharmacist
Posted on 25 May 2011.
This is a very positive move, and hopefully will be accepted by GPs as much more worthwhile than the current MUR process. National SOPs, training, etc. can be developed to minimise any extra bureaucracy.
Sign in to vote.
Top
Indrakumar ( Andy) Bakhai, Other pharmacist
Posted on 18 September 2011.
Indrakumar Bakhai
The changes made are desirable & necessary. Implications to the profession will certainly raise our image and thereto our status in the delivering of the Health Care in the NHS. However, the only reservation I have is " Would we be adequately rewarded financially?"
Sign in to vote.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.




 

Job of the week

Pharmacist & Technicians

Various locations

£45k + performance bonus

Follow C+D Jobs on