Pharmacy bodies urge engagement following concerns over NMS

Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
JemPharm ., Community pharmacist
Posted on 17 August 2011.
I would be behind this service whole-heartedly if it were remunerated on a 'one NMS, one fee' basis (though I do think £25 a throw is tad stingy).
However, based on our Pharmacy's items, the threshold payment scheme means 50 NMS could be carried out in the first six months, plus an additional 250 in the following twelve, without attracting any payment whatsoever.
Not the greatest incentive to back the new scheme.
Great value for money for the NHS though...



Perhaps that is what
Top
Antony Cracknell, Community pharmacist
Posted on 18/08/11 12:39 in reply to JemPharm .
I was just about to say the same thing. I don't mind there being a maximum based on script volumes, but why so complicated with the bandings?
Firstly I don't know my script volume till the end of the month, so I cannot know for certain what my NMS target will be, only retrospectively what it was.
Secondly, if for example I do 9 in a month and do 10,500 items, I get paid for 9. If I do 10,501 I get paid for none.
Anyway, congratulations to PSNC and DH for coming up with an amazing obstacle course to try and claw back the money they've taken off us to pay for it. Don't get me wrong, the service seems good and should benefit patients, make our role more worthwhile, show pharmacy can deliver etc. But when do we get new funds for this all this? I know there's a recession, but if we're improving adherence and cutting down hospital admissions, surely it can at least partly fund itself? I can't wait for the next service to be commissioned. At least Cat M prices can't fall below zero, or can they?!!
I want to be positive. I want to provide new services. I just want new money for doing them, otherwise they aren't NHS funded, they are pharmacy funded.
Top
A A, Community pharmacist
Posted on 18/08/11 15:53 in reply to Antony Cracknell.
Antony, the NMS is pharmacy funded. The DH have taken £110m from us. We are supposed to try and win it back by April 2013 by using the NMS. The banding proves beyond doubt that PSNC are colluding with the DH to make sure we never have that total £110m back.
Top
Emma Weinbren, Reporter, C+D
Posted on 19 August 2011.
Thank you for all your comments. For more details on funding please see our NMS Payment checker, which calculates how much you will be paid for the service:

http://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/pharmacy-business

Emma Weinbren
Reporter
Top
JemPharm ., Community pharmacist
Posted on 19/08/11 21:56 in reply to Emma Weinbren.
Surely our comments show we have all the detail on funding we need. What we want is a fair system of payment; one NMS, one fee. Anything else amounts to daylight robbery.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.




 

Job of the week

Pharmacist & Technicians

Various locations

£45k + performance bonus

Follow C+D Jobs on