Pharmacy leaders slam 'preposterous' error situation

The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Ketan Chandi, Superintendent
Posted on 1 September 2011.
This compromisation of data has been going on with the tacit approvel of the DH. As long as savings are made who cares if a few Pharmacies go to the wall!!
Top
Niall Hunt, Other healthcare professional
Posted on 1 September 2011.
While C+D welcomes and encourages open and honest debate, users should be aware that C+D will remove any comment it deems potentially libelous.
Please be careful when commenting not to post derogatory or inflammatory remarks.

Niall Hunt, Digital Content Editor
Top
Rajive Patel, Community pharmacist
Posted on 20/09/11 10:34 in reply to Niall Hunt.
The PSNC need to immediately contact the DOH and amend the settlement agreement to include a higher compensation payment.

Its truly astounding that if a contractor accidentally makes a wrong/incorrect claim, for whatever reason, then we can be put to the wall for fraud.

Surely the PSNC need to the hold the DOH to account, because on the same reasoning, are the DOH being fraudulent or culpable. Maybe there is a legal argument to be had here which should be funded by all the bodies we, as contractors, subscribe financially to.

Less rhetoric from the likes of Numark and more action (how many times have representative bodies whined that this is unacceptable, but the reality is that they cant force an acceptable outcome with words). Explore the legal route and at worst get a substantial settlement from the DOH. This is the only way the DOH will learn, otherwise, its the same old story, let them think they can urinate allover us.
Top
Rajive Patel, Community pharmacist
Posted on 20/09/11 10:37 in reply to Rajive Patel.
Numark, Avicenna, NPA, IPF etc, need to combine forces and instruct a legal firm to look into possible litigation.

I'm sick and tired of these bodies coming out to press and tell us what we already know. Lets see some action of substance. Lets explore litigation.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.




 

Job of the week

Pharmacist & Technicians

Various locations

£45k + performance bonus

Follow C+D Jobs on