Email
07 Nov 2011

Supply chain regulations “not fit for purpose”, BAPW warns government

Supply Chain Regulations governing patient access to medicines are "no longer "fit for purpose" and were written for "a world that no longer exists", the...
Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Clive Hodgson, Community pharmacist
Posted on 7 November 2011.
But are not certain members of the BAPW at least partly to blame for the current situation?

The unilateral decision of one BAPW member to go along with Pfizer and their DTP scheme seemed to be the start of many of our problems.
Sign in to vote.
Top
Peter Mcauley, Community pharmacist
Posted on 08/11/11 11:01 in reply to Clive Hodgson.
Although I agree with Clive's sentiments, I understand that if Alliance had not got the Pfizer contract then companies like DHL would have stepped in.
UDG do a lot of distribution for fresh bread etc., not too difficult for them to add Pfizer to their distribution chain.
Sign in to vote.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.



 

Job of the week

Pharmacist & Technicians

Various locations

£45k + performance bonus

Follow C+D Jobs on