Pharmacist suspended for dishonest use of Tesco Clubcard

Ethics Pharmacist Sofia Silva Brito Leonardo Rosa, registration number 2062636, has been suspended from the register for one month after using a Tesco Clubcard to...
Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Gerry Diamond, Other pharmacist
Posted on 13 December 2011.
I think that this is completely bonkers and a waste of the committees valuable time. A letter of reprimand or caution would have been nore apt.
Top
Kevin Hope, Superintendent
Posted on 13/12/11 15:32 in reply to Gerry Diamond.
Agree.
Another thing how clear are Tesco's policies?
Scapegoat springs to mind immediately as well as "Enterprise"
Admonishment adequate.
Top
Schar Minkel, Community pharmacist
Posted on 13/12/11 16:16 in reply to Kevin Hope.
Agree, completely OTT. Is this how they spend our fees??
Top
Jennifer Dunlop, Hospital pharmacist
Posted on 13/12/11 16:16 in reply to Kevin Hope.
I'm surprised Tesco haven't set up their system so that staff can't use other people's unclaimed points for their own benefit.
Top
R Cygan, Superintendent
Posted on 13 December 2011.
Mountains and molehills spring to mind. I would be interested to know how the GMC would have reacted to a similar crime?
Top
Bruce Pharmacist, Community pharmacist
Posted on 13/12/11 19:49 in reply to R Cygan.
I couldn't agree more with everyone else. OK yes it was a stupid thing to do but surely we have a better way of dealing with cases such as this - come on £25.18!!

This was two and a half years ago. GPhC lets think of another way to deal with this type of thing. We have to expect the GPhC to protect the public but I'm sure this poor pharmacist has suffered enough in worrying about what will happen over the last 30 months. I hope Ms Rosa appeals and gets admonished.
Top
Sher Khan, Pre-reg graduate
Posted on 13 December 2011.
This situation has been so over amplified. I dread to think what if I go over my parking meter by a minute!
Top
Indrakumar ( Andy) Bakhai, Other pharmacist
Posted on 14 December 2011.
I dissent from the Committees's opnion, The outcome, which is disproportionate and harsh. Justifies an appeal to restore her name on the Register."
What message does the committee wish to send?"The predominant consideration exercising our minds is that the message must be sent to profession and public that dishonest conduct, even on a small scale, is unacceptable." I agree with Mr Diamond " A Bonkus" approach to even bring before the GPhc!!!
I A Bakhai
Top
VAL MADDEN, Hospital pharmacist
Posted on 17 January 2012.
I cannot believe what I am reading .What a waste of time , and money ( my fees) bringing this case . This is a tesco civil matter , if I asa customer chose to give away my points to someone else does that make that person dishonest? eg when shopping with my daughter if I put my points on her card is she commiting an offence . No doubt Ms Rosa was a little silly . I would be hesi
tant to ask a customer / patient for their points it is not dignified howeve a letter of reprimand would have been more appropriate
Top
Sanjay Shah, Other pharmacist
Posted on 18 January 2012.
What complete and utter nonsense!!!
Top
Amal England, Locum pharmacist
Posted on 22 January 2012.
If you are a professional and you don't know that claiming points you are not entitled to, I find this surprising. For anyone else who is thinking about doing this, be warned that misuse of points is a serious offence: if a single person claims points they are not entitled to in one branch, multiply this by the total number of stores the company has, then it makes sense to punish offenders in a way that makes it unappealing to others. Only recently a staff member working for one of the big four supermarkets was sacked for claiming points for reusing the maximum number of bags instead of the one or two bags they were actually reusing, gaining a mere few Pennies. It seems harsh but if a clear message is not sent to other staff then it can be very costly for the company.
Top
Moktadiul Alam, Community pharmacist
Posted on 24 January 2012.
GPhC is expensive regulator to keep for registrants to deal with silly issue like this. Their decision biased by multiples and the affect of GPhC's decision on multiples not on the registrants. Its clearly visible when I see Boots staff posing with company badge on GPhC's home page. They should make better use of our fees.
Top
Moktadiul Alam, Community pharmacist
Posted on 24/01/12 11:21 in reply to Amal England.
We studied for 4 years and trained for 1 year not for the slavery of super market. We are professional and we deserve better treatment from multiples.
Top
Mansukhlal Shah, Locum pharmacist
Posted on 04/02/12 10:53 in reply to Thomas Heidi.
It seems GPHC have nothing better to do and I wonder how and if they will respond to all the complaints posted here.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments. However, any comments deemed to be libellous will be removed

Job of the week

Commercial Services Manager

Runcorn, Cheshire
£competitive

Follow C+D Jobs on

 
Should pharmacists be involved in the MMR catch-up programme?