Email
15 Dec 2011

GPhC dismisses sexual harassment claims against pharmacist

Ethics Pharmacist Asif Ghafoor, registration number 2058709, has been cleared of sexually harassing a patient by the GPhC, but given a warning over his...
Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Mr Dispenser, Community pharmacist
Posted on 15 December 2011.
If I thought a patient had a UTI, I would never perform a physical examination!
Sign in to vote.
Top
David Anderson, Superintendent
Posted on 18/01/12 19:50 in reply to Mr Dispenser.
I agree!!!
Sign in to vote.
Top
K Howell, Community pharmacist
Posted on 19 January 2012.
"not competent to undertake a physical examination"

What about independent prescribers for a start? It's reassuring to know that our own regulator has confidence in our competency...
Sign in to vote.
Top
Hassan Seedat, Superintendent
Posted on 19 January 2012.
I don't understand why a physical exam in needed in this case
Sign in to vote.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.



 

Job of the week

Pharmacist & Technicians

Various locations

£45k + performance bonus

Follow C+D Jobs on