Sandwell pharmacies urge PCT to block health centre opening

Business Sandwell contractors have urged their PCT to block attempts by a new health centre from opening a pharmacy on the premises, claiming that any such...
Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Brian Austen, Non healthcare professional
Posted on 3 February 2012.
The PCT has control over the control of entry. They can reject any application from a pharmacist outside the neighbourhood. They should state that is their intention.
Top
Chris Phillips, Other healthcare professional
Posted on 03/02/12 14:09 in reply to Brian Austen.
Incorrect.
Top
Osman Ali, PCT pharmacist
Posted on 03/02/12 14:22 in reply to Chris Phillips.
Yes but PCT can not stop a 100 hour pharmacy, Why do the PCT not put the pharmacy for exisiting pharmacy providers local to the area?? But then again healthcare pharmacies have very high rent.
Top
Din Patel, Other pharmacist
Posted on 04/02/12 00:03 in reply to Brian Austen.
With respect, it is called competition. Why do you object to it. It will create jobs for employee pharmacists. It will reduce the workload for existing pharmacists. It is win-win for employees. Contractors will lose, but a business must be subject to competition.
Top
Mohammed Zaryaab, Community pharmacist
Posted on 04/02/12 15:32 in reply to Din Patel.
We all know what the fuss is about. No one wants to lose script volume and so attempt to deceive the PCT and others by suggesting pharmacies will close. I can guarantee no local pharmacy will close as i know what the figures constitute in terms of remuneration. If I can run a 100 hr pharamacy at a profit at less than the script volume most of these 40hr contracts do then i dont see how their arguments can stand up. They are lucky that pharmacy is subject to strict regulation on competition: if it was any other business they wont have that safeguard. Besides, i dont think anyone would open up if the business didn't at least seem viable. So, stop clutching at straws guys, you wont be closing down. In fact, you are more likely to improve your service provision in order to retain custom...and that's what i call BUSINESS!!!!!
Top
Brian Austen, Non healthcare professional
Posted on 06/02/12 12:29 in reply to Osman Ali.
The PCT can set up a tender process and timeline that requires a contract to be in place. This would exclude opportunistic 100 hour applications, which the PCT can take up to 4 months to process up to preliminary consent.
Top
Brian Austen, Non healthcare professional
Posted on 12/07/12 09:09 in reply to Din Patel.
Din, I agree with you and support competition. I had my 'consultant head on', where I often act like the legal profession and support the point of view of the person I am representing. I have no personal or work interest in this case so my unbiased point of view is to agree with you.
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments. However, any comments deemed to be libellous will be removed

Job of the week

Commercial Services Manager

Runcorn, Cheshire
£competitive

Follow C+D Jobs on

 
Should pharmacists be involved in the MMR catch-up programme?