PSNC agrees transitional methadone payments for hardest hit pharmacies

Business PSNC has agreed to three transitional payments for contractors "most at risk" from the payment changes - eligible pharmacies will be contacted by...
Forgotten your password?
The page you are looking for is only available to logged in members of Chemist+Druggist.
Not a member yet?
Register now
If you are not a registered user, then please sign up here. Registering is free and takes just seconds. It gives you access to up-to-the minute news alerts and analysis, all our top bloggers.
If you experience any difficulties logging in or registering, or have any other questions, please contact Chemist+Druggist at haveyoursay@chemistanddruggist.co.uk
Comment on this article
You are not currently logged in. Login or register
Your Comments
Rashid Mahmood, Superintendent
Posted on 5 July 2012.
wow!
Top
Martin Bennett, Other pharmacist
Posted on 05/07/12 17:46 in reply to Rashid Mahmood.
Just think - this is supposed to be a "cost neutral simplification" imagine what they could do if they tried to reduce fees and make it complicated!!
Top
Z Rafiq, Community pharmacist
Posted on 06/07/12 14:33 in reply to Martin Bennett.
PSNC are not fit for purpose, the only negotiating committee who are actually damaging the very people who they speak on behalf of. I bet those at the top of the PSNC will be the toast of the Dept of Health for doing a wonderful job and who knows they may even get knighted in the end ( may be the only way to get rid of this bunch).

The NHS PS cant pay contractors correctly at the moment so to trust them to work out who is eligible for this new transitional payment seems odd.

Obviously, I along with many other independent contractors who dispense to a large number of methadone patients have been well and truley shafted (only word I can think of to describe the impact it is going to have on my pharmacy).

I have little hope for pharmacy in general if the PSNC are to continue our negotiations.
Are the PSNC the dept of health in disguise? or are the dept of health the PSNC in disguise?

This is just the beginning, believe me more pain is to come from the PSNC and it will filter down to everyone who works in a pharmacy, eventually reducing wages and good people losing jobs because our guardians the PSNC are too scared to ask the dept of health for renuminarations for services we are providing rather then proposing real term cuts and passing them of as simplifications. ( I think they think we have our heads stuck in the ground)
Top
Sachin Badiani, Non healthcare professional
Posted on 06/07/12 18:15 in reply to Martin Bennett.
I'm pretty good with my maths, but even I find this methadone "simplification" system very difficult to understand.

How's it going with the legal action??? You will have a lot of supporters (methadone dispensing and non-dispensing pharmacies alike).
Top
Michael Franks, Community pharmacist
Posted on 07/07/12 05:06 in reply to Z Rafiq.
psnc are not negotiating . they give in besides methadone payments we are losing out big time on broken bulk as well. we have not only given up trying to get b/b on dressings we are now losing out on any items under £50. so if you get a script for 10 tabs of a drug costing 49£ per 100 and you will not use it again you are £43 out of pocket. we lose on ensure as we cant get a discount on it from aah. we LOSE all the time. if the psnc cant negotiate we need to get a change at the top. or we should renegotiate their salaries down along with our income going down.
Top
Sachin Badiani, Non healthcare professional
Posted on 07/07/12 14:18 in reply to Michael Franks.
Talk of the devil, there is a new item we had today where the item is packed in 60 sachets, but only 10 was on prescription. The 60 sachets are £41 for the box, so with the broken bulk taken away, we will lose money!

I will clarify with PSNC or NPA on Monday (have put it with the page 6 from July 2012 Drug Tariff)....
Top

Please note You must be a registered user of Chemist+Druggist and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chemist+Druggist. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Chemist+Druggist coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments. However, any comments deemed to be libellous will be removed

Job of the week

Commercial Services Manager

Runcorn, Cheshire
£competitive

Follow C+D Jobs on

 
Should pharmacists be involved in the MMR catch-up programme?