Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Kristoffer Stewart on MURs: Dishonest practice surrounds us

The issue of unnecessary MURs is found across pharmacy, says C+D's clinical editor

The allegations that Boots is encouraging pharmacists to carry out unnecessary medicines use reviews (MURs) is as much of a revelation as millionaires dodging tax. This behaviour is most definitely not confined to Boots. It just happened to be the biggest – and arguably one of the easiest – targets.

I can’t speak for all my peers, but I feel confident most pharmacists have felt under pressure to carry out additional services at some point – a view reflected in C+D’s 2015 Salary Survey. This pressure can have a number of causes. Some pharmacists may want to prove their worth, show that the sector can make a difference, and that they should be considered on an equal footing to doctors and nurses.

However, there are also less noble pressures – usually financial. I’m not arguing against reimbursement for providing services, but in some pharmacies, the management see service funding as their right, rather than a privilege.

As a locum, it’s not uncommon to be told that you need to carry out MURs to ‘help’ the store reach their targets. This is something I have come to consider the norm.

I have been part of “Friday morning reviews” to discuss how “we” haven’t reached service targets for the week. In one independent pharmacy, I received a talking-to because I gave advice on inhaler use to an elderly patient, but didn’t get an MUR consent form signed. I have also worked in a pharmacy that was run as if it were a coffee shop. MURs were treated like latte sales – just another target.

The pressures I feel personally as a locum are twofold. Firstly, this is my livelihood. If I don’t perform as expected I may not be invited back to work. Secondly, I am often offered a higher locum rate depending on the number of MURs carried out. Although I have scruples, how am I to resist the temptation to earn more money just by saying a few words and getting a signature on a page, regardless of whether the patient benefits?

Actually I do care, just like the majority of pharmacists I have worked alongside. They work tirelessly day in and day out to ensure their patients have the best possible care. They certainly do not do it for praise; they do it because they feel both morally obliged and because they get a sense of satisfaction from helping people.

I think the allegations brought against Boots – regardless of their accuracy – are a stark reminder that dishonest pharmacy practice surrounds us. It lingers in corners and the ‘bad apples’ in the profession gives all of us a bad name. It is no wonder that when new services – such as the national pharmacy flu service – are introduced, we find GPs opposing us. Many still see us as health professionals hoping to turn a profit, at a cost to both the NHS and the quality of patient care.

To reassert our moral authority, we each have a responsibility to ensure patients come before profit.

Kristoffer Stewart is CPD and clinical editor of C+D, as well as a locum community pharmacist. Email him at [email protected] or contact him on Twitter at @CandDKristoffer

Result

How often do you feel pressured to provide an MUR, regardless of whether it will benefit the patient?
More than once a day
32%
Every day
34%
Two or three times a week
7%
Once a week
4%
Once a month
2%
Never
21%
Total votes: 1110

Read readers' reactions to the MUR abuse allegations here.

 


Do you agree with Kristoffer?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

Topics


         
Pharmacist
Yeovil, Winchester & Dorchester
£50-55,000 per annum

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD000952

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel