Chemist & Druggist is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC


This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission. Printed by #UserName#, #Company_Name#


Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Could MUR allegations undermine sector's funding cut fight?

Pharmacy Voice chief Rob Darracott says claims that Boots staff are pressured to carry out unnecessary MURs have caused "significant harm" to public perception

The sector “does not have time to turn inwardly” in the wake of allegations that Boots pressured staff to abuse medicines use reviews (MURs), Pharmacy Voice has said.

The Guardian published an article last week (April 13) accusing the chain’s managers of treating the government’s 400-MUR cap as a “target”. The newspaper also claimed that one Boots pharmacist from the Midlands had been instructed to carry out an MUR on a patient with dementia.

Read Boots' denial of the allegations here.

"Significant harm"

Pharmacy Voice chief executive Rob Darracott said the story has already caused “significant harm” to the sector’s reputation, at a time when the “window of opportunity” to persuade the government against imposing a 6% cut on pharmacy funding in England is “narrowing by the day”.

“We should be under no illusions. Stories like this undermine the case for the sector and, in the eyes of the public, damage the reputation of our profession,” he said.

Mr Darracott reiterated the importance of MURs, after defending their proper use last week. Pharmacists must demonstrate the success of MURs to make the “strongest possible case” for being commissioned to deliver more advanced services in the future, he said.

“Whether our best is providing a first rate service to our patients or fighting off ill thought-out government proposals, right now we can ill afford to do anything less,” he said.

Pharmacists' Defence Association chairman Mark Koziol told C+D last Friday (April 15) that the MUR system should be "comprehensively re-engineered" to focus more on clinical care.

C+D will be hosting a debate on Twitter, to discuss MURs, patient safety and targets - on Friday April 22 at 2pm. Join in and share your views; follow @ChemistDruggist and use the hashtag #MURabuse.

Result

How often do you feel pressured to provide an MUR, regardless of whether it will benefit the patient?
More than once a day
32%
Every day
34%
Two or three times a week
7%
Once a week
4%
Once a month
2%
Never
21%
Total votes: 1110

 

Do you feel under pressure to meet targets?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

 

Related Content

Topics

Pharmacist Manager

 Midlands, Cheshire & Dorset

 Salary dependent upon experience

Apply Now
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD008080

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel