Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Workplace pressures – what do the pharmacy bodies think?

The RPS has received concerns about professional autonomy, while Pharmacy Voice warns government plans could "exacerbate" pressures

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) has urged the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) to “move quickly from words to action” during its “programme of work” on pressures in pharmacy.

The regulator announced last week (June 15) that it will “address the issues raised” by a Pharmacists' Defence Association (PDA) survey on how target pressures compromise patient safety.

As well as hosting an event on the topic in October, it will also meet with a range of stakeholders, including pharmacy owners, to find out how they support their staff to "do the right thing in the first place", it said.

"Significant concerns" about autonomy

In response to the news, the RPS said it has been contacted by pharmacists raising “significant concerns” about professional autonomy, safe staffing levels, workload and rest breaks. Many of these pharmacists have also raised these issues with the GPhC, it added.

“Additional scrutiny” about target pressures in the Guardian’s coverage of the PDA’s survey in April should not be ignored, “however unfortunate the timing” , the RPS stressed.

It expects to play a “key role” in the GPhC’s discussions on target pressures, and urged trade bodies such as Pharmacy Voice to work with employers to “bring about a new covenant between the profession and those that employ them”, it said.

“The profession and patients need the GPhC and employers to make the rhetoric of professional autonomy into reality for those that work at the coal face every day,” the RPS added.

Action across the system

Pharmacy Voice told C+D that action to reduce workplace pressures is "required across the whole system".

"We meed honesty from all organisations – commercial, trade sector and professional – about taking this issue seriously," it said.

The government's plans to "reform" the sector will "only exacerbate" the pressures faced by pharmacy teams, and Pharmacy Voice "urges" the GPhC to take this into account.

Pharmacy Voice looks forward to working with the regulator to ensure that the issues raised are "properly considered and understood, so that this ends up making a real and constructive difference", it said.

"We have the wherewithal to tackle this [issue] together, if there is a willingness to do so," it said.

"A useful job"

The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) told C+D the GPhC’s initiative will have done a “useful job” if it helps to promote professional excellence.

“The NPA has always promoted best practice and we will continue to give practical help to our members to achieve the highest professional standards,” it said.

 


How do you think the GPhC should deal with workplace pressures?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

Related Content

Topics

         
Registrant member of the Assurance and Appointments Committee 
Nationwide
£ Renumeration

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD008186

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel