Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

47 pharmacists could be struck off for CPD failure

Professional The GPhC issued one removal, six notices of removal and 40 notices of intention to remove between January and February over CPD, it revealed at its council meeting this month

A pharmacist has been struck off the register and nearly 50 face the same fate so far this year for failing to submit their CPD records, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has revealed.


The regulator issued one removal, six notices of removal and 40 notices of intention to remove between January and February, it revealed at its council meeting this month (April 10). Within those two months, it requested more than 9,000 CPD records.


A total of 235 pharmacists requested extensions to the deadline for CPD submissions during this period. The GPhC refused 12 per cent of these requests, although it did not specify why.


Last year, 52 pharmacists were struck off the register for failing to submit their CPD, one of whom is appealing the decision.


The GPhC issued one removal, six notices of removal and 40 notices of intention to remove between January and February over CPD

More on CPD requirements

GPhC pledges to minimise time and costs of revalidation

GPhC continual assessment plans spark workload fears

CPD no-show sees pharmacist struck off and 126 at risk

The removals came as a result of the GPhC gaining new powers to remove pharmacy professionals who did not meet CPD requirements in 2011, which did not fully come into force until 2012.


The powers enable the GPhC to send registrants a notice of intention to remove if they do not produce adequate CPD, which can include failing to submit records altogether, producing entries that are irrelevant or making false declarations.


If the GPhC does not hear back within 28 days of sending the notice, it sends a supplementary notice. If the registrant fails to reply to this within a month, the GPhC can issue a notice of removal, giving the reasons behind the decision and informing them of their right to appeal.

 

The latest CPD cycle in numbers

● 8 weeks of calls for records

● 9,410 records requested

● 2,680 records reviewed

● 357 reminders sent

● 88% of submissions made online

Source: GPhC council papers, April 10


Do you struggle to achieve your CPD requirement every year?
 
We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD016960

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel