Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Boots 'disappointed' by order to remove nasal spray advert

The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that an advert for the defensive properties of Boots Cold and Flu Defence Nasal Spray is not supported by sufficiently robust evidence

Boots is “disappointed” the advertising regulator has ordered it to remove a poster claiming its nasal spray is "clinically proven to defend against cold and flu".

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the claim on the poster for Boots' Cold and Flu Defence Nasal Spray – which appeared on the London underground – is not supported by “sufficiently robust” evidence.

Boots stressed that the spray, which contains carrageenan, “has been shown in clinical trials to reduce the duration of cold and flu-like symptoms when used as symptoms begin”.

The health and beauty giant has revised its advertising materials “to ensure the intended use of the product is clearly understood”, it told C+D yesterday (November 18).

Boots submitted four studies on the effectiveness of other sprays that contain carrageenan, and one in vitro study on its own spray, the ASA said. The regulator sought “expert advice” before acknowledging that one of these studies provided “some evidence” that a carrageenan nasal spray “could reduce symptoms and duration of viral infections detected in patients, when taken alone and appropriately”.

However, even this study was “not sufficiently robust to show that the nasal spray was clinically proven to treat and prevent colds and flu”, it said in its ruling last week (November 11).

Not intended to prevent cold and flu

The ASA noted Boots’ view that the phrase “defend against” was not intended as a claim that its product could prevent cold or flu infections, but the regulator stressed that consumers would interpret the claim "as a whole" to mean the product has "been shown to have a prophylactic effect”.

The ASA told Boots that the advert must not appear in its current form again, and stressed that its future advertising must not “state or suggest” that the product could be used to treat and prevent cold and flu.

Last month, the ASA upheld a pharmacist’s complaint that an advert claiming that Boots Protect Plus Blue Lenses protect against “harmful” blue light was “misleading”.

 


Have you ever reported an advert to the ASA?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

Related Content

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD007837

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel