Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Boots takes battle with PDA Union to high court

Practice The multiple is challenging the Central Arbitration Committee’s decision to accept the PDA Union’s application to act on behalf of Boots’ pharmacists

Boots is taking its legal battle against the PDA Union to the high court this month.


The multiple is challenging the Central Arbitration Committee's (CAC's) decision to progress the union's application to formally represent Boots employees. The judicial review will take place on October 23.  

The judicial review will take place on October 23 and follows the CAC's rejection of Boots' appeal against the PDA Union gaining formal recognition to represent its employees.


The health and beauty giant reiterated on Friday (October 4) that, although it respected employees' rights to have union membership, it did not believe it was in the "wider interest" of its staff to formally recognise the PDA "at this time". 


Boots says it is not in the "wider interest" of its staff to formally recognise the PDA Union "at this time"

More on the PDA Union and Boots

Boots seeks review after appeal against       PDA Union rejected

Boots fights to avoid formal PDA union       representation

Central Arbitration Committee case


The PDA Union told C+D that it would consider taking its case to the European Court of Human Rights if the high court did not uphold the CAC's decision. 


Boots announced in February that it would be seeking a judicial review after the CAC refused to reconsider its January decision to accept the PDA Union's application. The CAC, the statutory adjudicator, said at the time that it still needed to be satisfied that the union had met the threshold of at least 10 per cent of pharmacists employed by Boots having membership.  

Boots told C+D last week that it would be questioning the CAC's departure "from the wording of existing legislation" and asking for clarity on what effect the PDA Union's application would have on its existing agreement with the Boots Pharmacist Association (BPA). The BPA told C+D it had no input into the battle.  

PDA Union general secretary John Murphy told C+D that the union would be making representations at the judicial review hearing.  

"If the high court upholds the CAC decision, Boots will have to get on with the process. If it doesn't, then the ultimate option we could take is to end up at the European Court of Human Rights," he said.  

The CAC will be further considering the PDA Union's application, including its membership, at a hearing on October 25.  

Boots UK employs about 6,000 pharmacists, according to its website, and the PDA Union claims to have 2,100 Boots members. The BPA said it had "just over"  2,000 members. 



Is Boots justified in refusing to formally recognise the PDA Union?

Comment below or email us at [email protected] You can also find C+D on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD016557

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel