Layer 1

Revealed: DH knew vulnerable patients at risk from cuts

Department of Health said pharmacy cuts could have a "detrimental effect" on certain patients
Department of Health said pharmacy cuts could have a "detrimental effect" on certain patients

Pharmacy closures will have a “greater detrimental effect” on patients with “protected characteristics”, the Department of Health (DH) acknowledged in an unpublished impact assessment.

According to the 38-page report – released internally in October 2016 and revealed during the High Court hearing last week – the DH also said “there may be a disproportionate effect on deprived communities were any closures to occur".

While the report maintains "there is no reliable way of estimating the number of pharmacies that may close as a result of [the funding cuts]", patients with protected characteristics – "who rely to a greater extent on pharmaceutical services" – would be impacted the most if any pharmacies did close, it said.

The protected characteristics referred to in the document are age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy, religion, race, sex and sexual orientation. The National Pharmacy Association challenged the DH in the High Court on the grounds that it failed to consider the impact its funding cut will have on these patient groups.

The DH's original impact assessment was published publically in October 2016, but as recently as January the DH denied to C+D that a second, related report existed.

According to this second report, the DH's "mitigating actions" – including the Pharmacy Access Scheme – will help ensure vulnerable patients still have access to pharmaceutical services if any pharmacies close.

However, the DH acknowledged the access scheme is “more likely to benefit rural, sparsely populated areas, rather than “built-up urban areas”.

Independents and services at risk 

The DH also acknowledged that single independent pharmacies and chains of between two and 20 pharmacies would be most at risk of closure as a result of its funding plans. "But even multiples may choose to close community pharmacies that do not bring in significant footfall," it stressed.

However, if any pharmacy were to close, there would be "immediate positive impact on the viability of remaining pharmacies", the DH argued.

The assessment lists scenarios – such as reductions in opening hours and reduced investment in staff training – as “other ways” in which the funding drop could be felt by patients and the public.

“There remains some risk that access will be reduced or that service quality may be affected,” the DH added.

But it stressed that this would be “minimised” to a level where “all patients would have access to community pharmacy services”. "It is very difficult to know whether community pharmacies are likely to close and – if so – what could replace them," it said.

Negative impact on women and certain religions

The DH also touched on how pharmacy closures could impact on pharmacy owners and employees.

It recognised that if there are a significant number of job losses as a result of pharmacy closures or financial belt-tightening, there could be a “negative follow-on effect on those of Asian origin, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims and women", due to "the distribution of ethnicity, religion and gender across the pharmacy profession", it said.

"There are likely to be opportunities for pharmacists to be employed elsewhere in the health and care system, particularly as a result of the pharmacy integration fund," it added. The push for more pharmacists in GP services would also bring opportunities, while "employment in hospital pharmacies will also continue to be an option".

C+D has contacted the DH to ask why it never published this second report.

Catch up on all of C+D's #CutsInCourt coverage from last week here.

5 Comments
Question: 
Do you think the DH should have published this impact assessment?

ajaz akhtar, Student

BUY DAILY MAIL TODAY....interesting front page article 

Ben Merriman, Community pharmacist

Legsit?

Leon The Apothecary, Student

The hard question that will never get answered offically is why this impact assessment was not published, it suggests an underhanded tactic and untrustworthy attitude from the department. 

ajaz akhtar, Student

Too much money in pharmacy, open up the market, you will then see people opening in deprived areas across the UK! Everyone's a winner. More access to pharmacy, less funding from government, end to the big 4 

Mark Ashmore, Superintendent Pharmacist

Surely the problem was that the government did open pharmacy up to the market and now regrets it.

Unless England wants an American style health service where about a third have no health insurance then we can't have a "market economy" NHS.

Job of the week

Pharmacy Manager
Fareham, Hampshire
Competitive plus benefits