Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

GPhC clarifies revalidation plans after Bawa-Garba manslaughter ruling

The GPhC has clarified its CPD "revalidation" proposals following "concern among pharmacy professionals" about the Dr Bawa-Garba judgment.

The High Court ruled last week (January 25) in favour of a General Medical Council (GMC) appeal that Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba be removed from the medical register. Dr Bawa-Garba was found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence in 2015, in relation to the death of a six-year-old boy at Leicester Royal Infirmary in 2011.

The British Medical Association (BMA) expressed concern last week (January 31) that the judgment would encourage “a culture of fear and defensiveness in the NHS, in which system failings will not be adequately taken into account when mistakes are made”.

Pharmacist reflections will not be discussed

Duncan Rudkin, chief executive of the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC), acknowledged that Dr Bawa-Garba's case had “caused concern among pharmacy professionals”.

“We understand that pharmacy professionals may be worried about reporting errors and taking part in processes to learn from errors,” Mr Rudkin said. “But it is vital for patient safety that errors are reported and discussed.”

The regulator’s “revalidation” proposals to change the CPD framework – which will begin to come into force this year – “seek to encourage and support pharmacy professionals to reflect on where their practice could be improved, during peer discussion”, he said.

“We want to be clear that we will not ask pharmacy professionals or peers to record what was discussed [during peer discussion],” Mr Rudkin stressed. “Instead they will be asked to record how the process benefitted their practice.”

He added that registrants' CPD records should not contain any details that could identify a patient.

“We will be producing further information to help pharmacy professionals understand what they are expected to do.”

Mr Rudkin also stressed that only the “most serious cases” are taken to the regulator’s fitness-to-practise process.

“A single dispensing error would only be taken forward if there were other aggravating factors,” he explained.

"Rapid review" commissioned by health secretary

Mr Rudkin added that the GPhC would “actively engage” with the rapid review commissioned by Jeremy Hunt yesterday (February 6).

The review – launched by the health secretary in the House of Commons – will look into whether gross negligence manslaughter laws are fit for purpose.

Read C+D's analysis of how the GPhC is addressing pharmacists' revalidation concerns here.

Are you comfortable discussing errors with your peers?

Related Content

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD009160

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel