Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

GPhC chief: 'Counterproductive' to set ideal number of pharmacy staff

It would be "counterproductive" for the GPhC to enforce a set number of pharmacy staff for each premises, the regulator's chief executive has told C+D.

It is important that the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) does not reduce staffing levels to a “set of numbers” or a “box-ticking exercise”, Duncan Rudkin told C+D in an exclusive interview on Monday (November 11).

“Every pharmacy is different” and it would therefore be “counterproductive for us to prescribe a number, for example, based on prescription volumes, which would risk being very out of date very quickly as services change”, Mr Rudkin said.

Pharmacy owners' responsibility

Instead, pharmacy owners “must think through their service and make sure that they have a staffing plan and resources” to meet their needs, he added.

This, Mr Rudkin said, is made clear in the GPhC’s standards for registered pharmacies, which require contractors to have “enough staff, suitably qualified and skilled, for the safe and effective provision of pharmacy services” and in its guidance to ensure a safe and effective pharmacy team, which it published last year.

“A pharmacy is a very dynamic environment, so it's important that the staffing plans and the way in which teams are organised throughout the day reflect that,” he said.

Tell-tale signs

Inspectors can identify a “number of tell-tale signs” during their pharmacy visits, which are symptomatic of inadequate staffing levels and that the GPhC would not be able to flag by “looking purely at the numbers”, Mr Rudkin said.

“Because they're professionals themselves, [inspectors] can see tell-tale signs, for example, about untidiness or stock that's been left out, [which] can prompt lines of inquiry, which then unearth some of these issues,” Mr Rudkin added.

The GPhC’s standards relating to the adequacy of staffing was the third most commonly unmet standard by pharmacies inspected in April-June, according to GPhC council papers published in September.

The issues identified included: “inadequate staff numbers to cope with the workload; staffing levels not being adequately considered before taking on a new service; and inadequate provision to accommodate planned or unplanned absences”, the GPhC said.

Last year, the GPhC wrote to pharmacy bodies to ask them what steps they were taking to address inadequate staffing levels.

The C+D Salary Survey 2018 revealed that 40% of pharmacists who describe themselves as stressed self-check prescriptions every day, while 32% have to do this a few times a week.

Do you think the GPhC should introduce minimum staffing levels for pharmacies?

Related Content

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD006195

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel