Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

GPhC reveals plans for continual assessment

Professional Pharmacists’ competence will be continually reviewed from 2018, through peer and CPD reviews and the use of performance indicators, the regulator has said

Pharmacists and technicians will undergo revalidation from 2018, which will involve an ongoing review of their fitness to practise, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has announced.


The GPhC set out its proposals for revalidation, which it is now calling ‘continuing fitness to practise', at its council meeting last week (November 14). The checks on pharmacists and technicians will involve a peer review, a CPD review and the use of performance indicators, it said, but did not indicate how often the checks would take place.  


But the regulator stressed that the model was not yet concrete and committed to working with pharmacy professionals and the public to ensure the process was "flexible and straightforward".


The GPhC committed to working with pharmacy professionals and the public to ensure the revalidation process was "flexible and straightforward"

More on fitness to practise

GPhC begins work to introduce extra fitness to practise checks

Abusive pharmacist struck off for failing to show remorse and falsifying testimonials

Former Boots manager rapped by GPhC for abusing staff discount

Under the plans, pharmacists and technicians will undergo peer reviews of their work run by GPhC-accredited organisations. The GPhC said it would aim to build on existing reviews such as appraisals but stressed these were likely to need modifying to "deal with professional issues" and "engage directly" with standards.


The regulator also set out plans to revamp the CPD process to put a greater onus on quality. More than 99 per cent of registrants complied with the current review process, it said, demonstrating that registrants "clearly engaged" with CPD.


But the GPhC said its impact on practice was not clear and pledged to review the model. This could involve sampling CPD rather than calling for everyone's records, it said, which could prove cheaper and more proportionate.


Performance measures would make up the third element of the continuing fitness to practise checks, the GPhC said. The regulator did not clarify what these measures would be, but said they would "vary according to the scope of a registrant's practice" and be developed in consultation with the profession.


The GPhC first set out its plans for revalidation last January. The work reflected the Department of Health's agenda to ensure healthcare professionals remained competent after registration, the GPhC said at the time.


Revalidation for doctors was introduced in December. But the GPhC said it would avoid using the term revalidation, instead using ‘continuing fitness to practise' to highlight that it would be an ongoing process.


The GPhC expects to develop a full model for the checks by September next year, followed by three years of testing, consultation and evaluation before implemention in 2018.


"This new framework will look at both the competence and professionalism of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians," said GPhC chief executive Duncan Rudkin.


"Over time, it will strengthen our assurance to patients and the public that the pharmacy professionals they seek advice and care from are up to date and fit to practise."



Will the GPhC's plans raise standards of care in pharmacy?

Comment below or email us at [email protected] You can also find C+D on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook

What do you think?

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD016651

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel