Layer 1

GPs: CCGs with expanded powers need a pharmacist

GP Amit Bhargava, clinical officer for Crawley CCG, believes pharmacists are key in improving the health of the population

It is "essential" for commissioners who want full responsibility for enhanced services to involve pharmacists, GPs tell C+D

All clinical commissioning groups (CCG) will need to employ a pharmacist if they want to take on more responsibility for local health services, GPs have said.

NHS England is considering whether to delegate full responsibility for enhanced services to CCGs, and GPs told C+D it would be “essential” to involve pharmacists in commissioning decisions if CCGs were granted these extra powers.

Amit Bhargava, a GP and chief clinical officer for Crawley CCG, said a community pharmacist was already part of his CCG and brought “value” to its discussions. “We want to improve the health of the population and pharmacists are key to this,” he told C+D on Thursday (December 4).

Ken Aswani, a GP and clinical lead of primary care organisation NHS Alliance, said some CCGs were better equipped to take over the commissioning of enhanced pharmacy services than others. CCGs would benefit from national commissioning guidelines to ensure a “reasonable standard” across the country, he said.

“You’ll get the weak players and the strong players, but you don’t want a high percentage to not be able to do the job because that affects local pharmacy services. There is a real role [for] an off-the-shelf way of commissioning minor ailments [schemes],” Dr Aswani said.

Croydon GP Dharini Shanmugabavan agreed there “has to be” a pharmacist on every CCG to improve awareness of the sector. “Pharmacy is an area we don’t understand that well, because [it] has always been privatised in a way,” he told C+D.

NHS England is considering a range of options for commissioning primary care services in the future, including fully delegating responsibility for enhanced services to CCGs. The commissioning body told C+D in October that it would know in January how many CCGs wanted this option, and that it could become a reality from 2016.

Last month, some LPC leaders warned that giving CCGs more commissioning powers would "fragment" pharmacy services by increasing variation between different areas. But others welcomed the proposals and argued that CCGs were keen to commission more services from the sector.  


Should CCGs be given greater commissioning powers? 

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information


R A, Community pharmacist

Unfortunately sir if you wish for true impartiality then pharmacist on the board must be someone who is not employed by a multiple i.e. an independent contractor. Otherwise I believe it would be conflict of interest.

Stuart Hill, Community pharmacist

Agreed with above. If we do what we have always done we will have what we have always had. It is uunfair, unrepresentative and non-inclusive to have a multiple only pharmacist who let's face it puts profit before ideas. Until that day...

SP Ph, Community pharmacist

While we fight here, some news from BBC Why waste time in Pharmacy ?? Get an internship for bricklaying and off you go ........

London Locum, Locum pharmacist

Only post worth reading

Job of the week

Pre-registration Pharmacist
Sheffield, South Yorkshire
Up to £25,000