Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Judge throws out Boots employees' premium pay claim

People A judge has thrown out claims that Boots discriminated against 140 pharmacists by reducing their premium pay, ruling that the employees were too late in filing their cases.

A judge has thrown out claims that Boots discriminated against 140 pharmacists by reducing their premium pay, ruling that the employees were too late in filing their cases.  


The pharmacists should have brought their claim for discrimination earlier and were "out of time", employment tribunal judge Peter Britton ruled at a hearing last month (April 25-26).


The employees filed their claim at an employment tribunal in May 2012 after 19 colleagues successfully challenged the health and beauty giant for acting unlawfully when it cut Sunday pay rates by a quarter in June 2011.  


The 140 claimants are still awaiting a judgement on claims for unlawful deductions of wages

More on the Boots premium pay dispute

PDA determined to 'take on' Boots at second premium       pay tribunal

Boots employees face ‘some risk' in refusing premium       pay cuts

Boots employees win battle over Sunday rate cuts

MORE NEWS

The 19 pharmacists who lodged a claim in December 2011 received arrears of their Sunday pay at double time from the date of the first deduction. They had also claimed discrimination because of unfair treatment on the grounds of age and sex.


In the current case, the judge accepted Boots' argument that the pharmacists should have brought their claims earlier, the PDA Union said last week (May 3).


"We argued that the unlawful deductions continued from June 1, 2011 and that every month there was a continuing deduction and, therefore, a continuing act and detriment," it said.


Boots argued there was just one deduction that took place in June 2011.


The 140 claimants are still awaiting a judgement on claims for unlawful deductions of wages as the same judge ruled the discrimination and wage issues should be heard separately. 


A Boots spokeswoman said: "We are working closely with our colleagues to shape together the future of pharmacy for the benefit of our patients and our business and our commitment to all Boots colleagues including pharmacists, remain the same – we want colleagues to feel properly rewarded and recognised for the great care they provide every day."   


What do you make of the judge's ruling?

Comment below or email us at [email protected] You can also find C+D on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD016200

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel