Layer 1

Multiples show their pharmacy care plan service is 'cost effective'

Pharmacy care plans could reduce healthcare costs by up to 21%, the largest multiples claim
Pharmacy care plans could reduce healthcare costs by up to 21%, the largest multiples claim

Using pharmacy care plans to support patients with long-term conditions could reduce healthcare costs by up to 21%, the UK’s four largest multiples have claimed.

The Community Pharmacy Future (CPF) group – which consists of Boots, Lloydspharmacy, Rowlands and Well – said the care plan service they piloted “must become part of the integrated package of care commissioned by the NHS so that each patient gets appropriate support to reach their health goals”.

Thirty-eight community pharmacies in West Yorkshire, including independents and supermarkets, took part in a pilot of the service between February 2015 and June 2016, which saw 378 patients undergo a personalised care plan devised in partnership with their pharmacist, the group said in a report published today (April 3).

Pharmacy teams used “patient activation (see below), goal setting and therapy management” to encourage patients over the age of 50 and on one or more medicines, “including at least one for cardiovascular disease or diabetes”, to manage their own long-term conditions, with regular consultations at a pharmacy over a 12-month period, it added.

According to an independent evaluation of the pilot, conducted by researchers at the University of East Anglia, 93% of patients who attended the first appointment agreed one or more health goals with their pharmacist, with 39% of these patients having achieved one or more of these goals after 12 months.

How costs could be reduced

The report's authors stated that “despite the intensive nature of the service”, with “multiple interventions over an extended period of time”, costs were reduced “by making use of the whole pharmacy team, including healthcare assistants obtaining clinical measurements”.

The authors suggested that by moving from the lowest to highest level of “activation” – the knowledge, skill and confidence a person has in managing their health – “healthcare costs can be reduced by up to 21%”, they stated.

The cost-effectiveness of the PCP service was estimated to be £8,495 per “quality adjusted life year” – one year of life in perfect health. The National Institute for health and Care Excellence (Nice) considers £20,000-£30,000 to be “cost effective”, the authors pointed out.

Clare Kerr, head of healthcare policy and strategy for Lloydspharmacy parent company Celesio UK, said the service “support[s] patients with multiple, long-term conditions to become more activated and better able to self care, improving their potential outcomes and reducing the cost of their care to the system”.

The results showed an “ever-increasing evidence base for the value of community pharmacy”, Ms Kerr added.

Lead author of the paper Dr Michael Twigg, lecturer in primary care pharmacy at the University of East Anglia, said the results were “encouraging”. “We look forward to working closely with industry colleagues to enhance the role of community pharmacy in identifying and addressing public health needs,” he added.

Future integration

Following the pilot, Ms Kerr said that “either the full-service package, or elements of it, can easily be integrated into wider primary care models”.

The service can support patients with long-term conditions to “self care”, in turn “improving their potential outcomes and reducing the cost of their care to the system”, she added.

Read why Phoenix Healthcare group managing director Steve Anderson believes this new research could help usher in a pharmacy contract that unlocks the sector's potential here.

5 Comments
Question: 
Would you like to offer this service to patients?

Freelance Chemist, Pre-reg Pharmacist

I wonder if they will set a target for this and then bully the pharmacist to fudge the figures so they can max the profits and mil it like the MURs.........

....WATCH this space, heard it here first

Leon The Apothecary, Student

Reading the article, it seems to me that the intention is to make pharmacy and surgery into basically one entity. A one-stop shop for healthcare essentially. Having all our major healthcare professionals in the community working synergetically together, and this, in my opinion, would be logistically and clinically a robust and comprehensive system with many benefits for both patients and the NHS.

However, the abutment is that the NHS payment structure for these two put each other in competition with one another, for example, the distribution of Flu vaccinations, there was an article showcasing a poster actively requesting patients do not use pharmacies to have their flu vaccination administered.

 

Richard MacLeavy, Non Pharmacist Branch Manager

I have to be honest, I can't see it happening. When we hear the powers that be talk about treating more people in the community, its clear they are refering to GP's not pharmacies. And when we ask what does the future hold for pharmacy, we are pointed toward automation possibly with some oversight by a technician. 

Leon The Apothecary, Student

I have to agree that the traditional dispensing model of regular medications is definitely heading towards automation, especially in recent years. Pharmacy in its current definition needs to evolve, either by those already here, or those that seek to usurp the current status quo.

Adam Hall, Community pharmacist

It would be great to offer such a service but it would require several things to happen -

1. The service could not be predicated on being delivered solely by pharmacists - thereby enabling the whole team to get involved

2. It would require proper funding - that is to say, funding based on the value (i.e. how much will be saved) to the NHS and NOT on what the commissioners think we should be paid, which is often so derisory as to border on contempt

3. GPs would have to let go!

Job of the week

Pharmacist Manager
Wrexham , North Wales
Great Salary & Bonus.