Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

PCTs that deliberately blocked 100-hour bids face legal action

Legal Law firm Charles Russell has said that deliberately ignoring 100-hour bids constituted a breach of the law, as businesses pursue substantial damages from PCTs that blocked applications until the cut-off date passed.

Pharmacists are seeking damages from PCTs that "deliberately" blocked their applications to open 100-hour pharmacies, lawyers have revealed.

Law firm Charles Russell said it was pursuing claims for "substantial damages" against trusts that failed to process 100-hour applications before the cut-off date of September 1.

And this rendered void some applications "validly submitted" before September's changes to control-of-entry regulations, the legal experts have argued.

Charles Russell head of healthcare David Reissner said he was "confident" that deliberately ignoring applications constituted a breach of the law

More on 100 hours

GPs eye surgery pharmacies despite 100-hour demise

FAQ: Farewell, 100 hours

Why the Department of Health removed the       100-hour exemption

Charles Russell head of healthcare David Reissner said he was confident that deliberately ignoring applications constituted a breach of the law – and PCTs faced the possibility of paying out substantial sums of money. Mr Reissner could not name the PCTs or companies involved as it could jeopardise the claims, he said.

Pharmacy companies told C+D they had not encountered any problems with the processing of their 100-hour applications. Tesco superintendent pharmacist Adrian Price said the supermarket had nothing to report, while independent chain MedicX Pharmacy said it had no experience of its applications being unduly delayed. Sainsbury's declined to comment.

The removal of the 100-hour exemption in September was backed by the overwhelming majority of respondents to the Department of Health's consultation on the issue. But the proposals faced opposition from Tesco and Asda, with Sainsbury's labelling them a retrograde step.

In the 2011-12 financial year, 716 applications were made to open 100-hour pharmacies, of which 92.5 per cent were granted, according to NHS figures released a fortnight ago.

If the exemption had continued, the DH estimated it would have seen a further 851 pharmacies open in the next 10 years – costing the NHS an estimated £72 million a year.



Do you think legal action against PCTs is justified?

Comment below or email us at [email protected] You can also find C+D on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD015852

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel