Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Specials cost-cutting could jeopardise quality

Practice After a survey found that 40 per cent of pharmacists had been pressured by PCTs to cut specials costs, experts have warned against the routine production of medicines under section 10, claiming quality controls are not rigorous enough.

Pressure to cut specials costs by sourcing them cheaply could lead to a drop in quality, the Association of Pharmaceutical Specials Manufacturers (APSM) has warned.

The APSM said many pharmacists felt under pressure to cut the cost of specials after a survey conducted by the association suggested 40 per cent had been told by PCTs to reduce spend.

The survey of 200 pharmacists revealed that half believed, to save money, specials should be manufactured under section 10 of the medicines act, which allows the medicine to be assembled in a registered pharmacy.

An APSM survey suggested 40 per cent of pharmacists had been told by their PCTs to reduce spend on specials

More on specials

Special effects

PCTs pile pressure on pharmacists to slash costs

Specials drug tariff error leaves pharmacist £465 out       of pocket

And half believed that there was no difference in quality between a special prepared under section 10 and a medicine manufactured in accordance with an MS licence.

A quarter of respondents said they had changed the way they sourced specials since the new tariff was introduced in November.

"The section 10 exemption is intended for emergencies and is not subject to the rigorous quality measures required of any special manufactured under an MS license," a spokesperson said.

Responding to the comments, the NPA confirmed that it had seen PCTs pile pressure on pharmacists to reduce medicines spend. Although it had not received many reports in recent months, the support group said it had noticed the issue arising last year, when the new specials tariff was introduced.

"Last year, we received numerous enquiries from pharmacists who were being told by PCTs to source specials from specific companies and directing doctors to specify specials manufacturers on the prescription," said NPA head of pharmacy Leyla Hannbeck.

But contractor Mike Hewitson of Beaminster Pharmacy, Dorset, said he was "dead-set against" specials being produced under section 10. "Manufacturing a product in a pharmacy will never be at a comparable standard to doing it with the right equipment and the right environmental monitoring," he said.

Mr Hewitson added that pharmacists were "taking a risk" by preparing medicines themselves. "You're probably going to be doing this once in a blue moon," he argued. "Are pharmacists' skills really up to the standard that they might have been 10 years ago, when they were doing this once a week?"


Have you been manufacturing more specials under section 10?

Comment below or email us at [email protected] You can also find C+D on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD015584

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel