Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Technician suspended for dispensing errors and assault

Hospital pharmacy technician Craig Adam Ashton, 5020369, received a caution for assault and made 14 errors in two years, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) heard

A hospital pharmacy technician has been suspended for 12 months for assaulting a “vulnerable woman” and making repeated dispensing and labelling errors.

Craig Adam Ashton, registration number 5020369, made 14 errors in two years while working as a pharmacy technician at the Royal Derby Hospital, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) heard at a fitness-to-practise hearing on June 8. Mr Ashton was also cautioned by the police for assault in May 2012, it heard.

The GPhC accepted that Mr Ashton had been under “particular stress” in his personal life at the time he made the errors. It also noted that the assault had been an "isolated incident".

But the regulator stressed that while no actual harm had come to patients as a result of the errors, there was a “clear risk” that patients could have come to harm if the "serious" errors had not been detected.

Dispensing errors

Mr Ashton had been working as a technician at the hospital for seven years before he made the first of 14 errors in August 2010. These included dispensing half the prescribed dose of blood pressure treatment ramipril, dispensing magnesium instead of the antibiotic teicoplanin, two instances of dispensing medicine with the wrong person's name and four instances of labelling medicines with the wrong directions, the regulator heard.

During a series of formal and informal performance management reviews, Mr Ashton told his manager he felt he had “trusted the labeller too much” and acknowledged he “needed to slow down and not rush to keep up with his workload”, the GPhC heard. Mr Ashton also claimed "difficulties at home" had been affecting his work, and later cited that “the pressure of being managed for his errors was making him worried about losing his job”. 

Mr Ashton took two months off "as a result of personal issues” from December 2011. Despite claiming to have “put his external issues behind him”, he continued to make errors once he returned to work and was dismissed from his position in November 2012, the GPhC heard.

Caution for assault

Mr Ashton also received a police caution in May 2012 for assaulting a woman the previous December, the GPhC heard. He had been "out drinking all day" with colleagues for a Christmas party, and the assault had caused "actual harm" to the victim, who was in a "vulnerable condition" at the time, the GPhC heard.

The regulator noted Mr Ashton had demonstrated remorse and had "admitted the offence at the earliest opportunity". There had been "no repetition of any similar behaviour", it said.

But the GPhC stressed that the assault had brought the profession into disrepute and the attack could have resulted in "consequences much more serious than they were”.

The regulator noted that he had not worked in a pharmacy setting since his dismissal, and was currently employed in the hospital’s medical records department, where he had recently been promoted.

The GPhC said there was "potential" for Mr Ashton to "remedy" his dispensing errors, and noted that he wished to return to work as a technician. But he had not provided a "coherent plan" for how he would do this, it said.

It ruled that a 12-month suspension was sufficient time for him to do this by seeking further training and revalidation. The length of the suspension was also necessary to "reflect the seriousness" of the police caution, it added.

Read the full determination here.

 


What do you make of the ruling?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

Related Content

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD007523

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel