'The EU medicines scanning law convinced me we need Brexit'

"Pharmacy is nowhere near understanding how it will be able to fulfill its obligations under FMD"

John D'Arcy considers the enormity of the "dog's breakfast" that is the incoming EU scanning law

It’s been over a year since the EU referendum. I confess that I was in the remain camp, and was convinced the majority shared this view. It was therefore with absolute incredulity that I stared at my TV on the Friday morning following the vote, to learn that we had voted to leave.

So shocked was I, that I even rang Samsung to inform them that something was awry with the telly. And, for the first time ever, I seriously considered that I was unfit for work.

I did however pull myself together and, as it happened, that day attended a meeting to consider the implications on pharmacy of the latest legal straitjacket emanating from the EU – the falsified medicines directive (FMD). While this turned out to be an awful meeting, it did improve my mood, to the extent of convincing me that the UK population had come to the right decision in voting to leave the EU.

Enormous piece of legislation

The objective of the FMD is to prevent counterfeits finding their way into the EU supply chain. By February 9, 2019, every pharmacy in the UK will be required to scan barcodes, check tamper-proof devices and decommission medicines to prevent them from being reused.

No one could argue against such an objective, but the FMD would appear to be the largest of sledgehammers to crack a nut. While counterfeits do exist, the extent of any problem appears to be greatly exaggerated – something that is further helped by the scaremongering of manufacturers, who seek ways of controlling the supply chain.

Whatever the background, we now find ourselves having to implement an enormous piece of legislation that raises far more questions than it does answers.

With only 18 months to go, pharmacy is nowhere near an understanding of how it will be able to fulfill its obligations under the directive. And don’t be fooled into thinking that our exit from Europe will avoid our having to implement its requirements.

A key factor in Brexit negotiations will be a trade deal across Europe. To trade with the EU, the UK's pharmaceutical industry will need to be able to adopt common standards for medicines authentication. If the UK is not able to do this, we will be out in the cold.

Enormous challenges

There are enormous challenges associated with implementation. First, while a shortlist is under consideration, at the time of writing, the supplier for this barcode scanning system is yet to be appointed.

Then there is the old chestnut of split packs.

The UK stands apart from other EU countries in dispensing part packs. Under the FMD, packs are supposed to be scanned once, then decommissioned. So how do we deal with split pack dispensing?

One potential positive outcome of all of this may be the move to the universal use of original pack dispensing – but I won’t hold my breath. And even if we do get to patient pack dispensing, this still leaves the challenge of dealing with monitored dosage system trays and compliance packs – a feature of our process that is not common practice throughout Europe.

After authenticating and decommissioning a medicine, there will be a 10-day period when the decommissioning can be reversed. But in the UK, patients often ask their pharmacists to pre-order medicines. If they don’t pick up their prepared medicine pack within 10 days – and the medicines have already been decommissioned – medicines will be unusable.

All in all, implementation of the FMD is a dog’s breakfast.

As it is, implementation is largely incompatible with community pharmacy practice. FMD highlights the difficulty associated with an arm’s length, largely unaccountable, bureaucracy attempting to impose a “one size fits all” solution on 26 countries, each with its own pharmacy processes and arrangements. In so doing, it fetters our ability to make our own health-related decisions.

We live in a period of austerity and should be focusing on priorities, particularly when it comes to health spending – which is already out of control. FMD is way out of all proportion to the problem it seeks to fix. As such, it represents a luxury we can ill afford.

John D'Arcy is managing director of pharmacy support services provider Numark

2 Comments

Uma Patel, Community pharmacist

I am glad someone higher up has reflected almost verbatim my view which I posted a few weeks ago. In spite of Brexit, I am afraid we are lumbered with this Directive due to our weak leadership at the EU. I understand Italy and Greece have dispensation to delay implementation. May be we can apply to do the same.

This is one cause for which community pharmacy and suppliers can unite to oppose the implementation

In any case I suspect this will be obsolete in a few years when 'molecular bar coding' is implemented, which is already being tested in food industry in the USA.

Marie-Anne Pollaud, HR & Training

I would tend to agree that the FMD is a poorly thought-out and likely to be poorly implemented idea. 

However, Brexit entails a hell of a lot more than just the FMD; and while I don't worry about the effects of not implementing it in the UK, I do worry about the rest. EU citizens rights (including many valued pharmacy colleagues who have borne the brunt of abuse and scorn for the last fourteen months), the EMA jumping ship, us crashing out of the Single Market, the Customs Union and Euratom without so much as an assessment, you name it. 

Brexit sounds like a luxury the UK cannot afford, and probably more than the FMD in its own right ever was. 

Job of the week

Pharmacist Managers + Relief Pharmacists
Various locations in the North West
Competitive Salary – Attractive Relocation Packages & other benefits
Normal datacapture modal