Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Boots manager struck off for stealing perfume testers

Fitness to practise GPhC rules Sudhir Manilal Monji, registration number 2031792, was guilty of “gross and serious dishonesty”

A Boots pharmacist manager has been struck off the professional register for attempting to steal a "substantial quantity" of perfume testers from the company.


Sudhir Manilal Monji, registration number 2031792, loaded two crates of fragrance testers into his car and drove away "aggressively" when challenged, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) heard at a fitness-to-practise hearing on December 10.


Mr Monji then arranged for someone to leave the testers in the store's disabled toilet two days later and claimed they had never left the store, the regulator heard.


The GPhC rejected the claims of Sudhir Manilal Monji, registration number 2031792, that he had not taken the testers, and said he had tried to mislead the GPhC by discrediting witnesses and giving false evidence

More on fitness to practise

Pharmacy owner suspended for £2,000 fraud

Lloyds pharmacist gets official warning over warfarin error

Pharmacist suspended for illicit drug use

The GPhC accepted that Mr Monji was an "excellent pharmacist" of general good character. But it rejected the 52-year-old's claims that he had not taken the testers, and said he had tried to mislead the GPhC by discrediting witnesses and giving false evidence.


Mr Monji was the manager of a Boots branch in Whetstone at the time of the theft in September 2010. He ordered fragrance testers from head office using an electronic system without speaking to the branch's beauty consultant, who placed a separate order, and identified himself by using the reference ‘S'.


The store's team was suspicious of Mr Monji's behaviour and informed Boots' profit protection manager. The profit protection manager visited the store and saw Mr Monji carrying crates to his car, which he believed contained the perfume testers.


When Mr Monji was confronted, the profit protection manager said he refused to stop the car despite him "chasing and banging on the boot", and drove through shrubbery to get away. The fragrance testers had disappeared from the stock room, where they had originally been stored.


A staff member at the store said he had received a call that night from Mr Monji, who reported that he had been seen taking the fragrance testers and asked for help.


Two days later, a woman came into the branch carrying a large suitcase and hiding her face from CCTV cameras, and went into the disabled toilets. The fragrance testers were found in the disabled toilets the following morning.


Mr Monji was subsequently dismissed from Boots, which he unsuccessfully appealed at an employment tribunal. Staff at the Boots branch said there had been no more large orders of fragrance testers since Mr Monji left the company.


Mr Monji maintained his innocence and claimed the testimonials were false. He admitted to ordering a small number of testers but denied taking any of them and said Boots' profit protection manager had only seen him loading empty crates into his car.


Mr Monji branded the evidence from the profit protection manager "improbable, flawed and untrue" and argued that one of the staff members held a grudge against him.


The GPhC accepted that Mr Monji was a caring pharmacist with a "long and distinguished record". But it rejected the claim that there was a "conspiracy" to give false evidence against Mr Monji and ruled that he had lied to escape the consequences of his actions.


The GPhC said Mr Monji was guilty of "gross and serious dishonesty" and ruled to strike him off the register.


Read the full transcript of the hearing here.



What do you make of the GPhC's ruling?

Comment below or email us at [email protected] You can also find C+D on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook

Topics

         
Pharmacist Manager
Barnsley
£30 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD016749

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel