6 Boots pharmacists launch bid for full PDA representation
Six Boots pharmacists have launched a legal challenge to have their pay, hours and holiday collectively negotiated by the Pharmacists’ Defence Association (PDA) Union.
The challenge was “hand delivered” to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) – the independent body responsible for resolving workplace disputes – last Friday (July 28) afternoon, PDA director of defence services Mark Pitt told C+D this morning (July 31).
The application is to formally “derecognise” the multiple's own union, the Boots Pharmacists’ Association (BPA), Mr Pitt explained.
The dispute dates back to January 2012, when the PDA Union called for official recognition from Boots, after alleging the multiple's employees were tired of their employment terms being "gradually eroded" (see timeline below).
In February 2017, the Court of Appeal upheld a High Court decision that Boots’ refusal to formally recognise the PDA Union was lawful. At the time, the High Court judge said the union would have to find a Boots pharmacist to support its application to have the BPA “derecognised”and end its bargaining powers at the multiple.
BPA response
In a statement published on its website today, the BPA confirmed it had received notification of the legal challenge.
“This was expected by the BPA following the decision of the Court of Appeal, which indicated that derecognition was the only route left for the PDA Union to gain recognition by Boots. We will work through the due process which follows,” the BPA added.
Boots was unavailable for comment at time of going to press.
"Thousands" of Boots pharmacists represented
Speaking to C+D this morning, Mr Pitt said the PDA Union – which "has been asked to speak on behalf" of the six Boots pharmacists – only needed one pharmacist from the multiple to sign the legal challenge and formally launch proceedings. But “we have half a dozen just to be on the safe side”.
The PDA Union represents “approximately 2,300” Boots employees, Mr Pitt estimated, but currently cannot negotiate their pay, hours or holiday.
In a statement published last Friday (July 28), PDA Union general secretary John Murphy said “the individuals taking this action are representative of many thousands of Boots pharmacists who have been frustrated by their employer’s actions”.
According to figures submitted to the government, the BPA had 1,253 members at the end of 2016.
Next steps
Mr Pitt told C+D that the CAC has 10 working days to either accept or reject the pharmacists’ application, at which point all Boots employed pharmacists below area manager level, as well as pre-registration trainees, will be subject to a secret ballot to decide whether to have the BPA “derecognised” as Boots’ sole union.
“There has never really been an application...before to derecognise a non-independent union,” Mr Pitt claimed. “This is a real opportunity for pharmacists to take back control of their working environment.”
The Boots and PDA saga so far...
The PDA Union asks Boots for formal recognition to allow it to represent its pharmacists, after claiming the multiple's employees are seeing their employment rights "gradually eroded". Boots tells C+D it is working closely with the Boots Pharmacists' Association (BPA) on the issue.
March 2012
The PDA Union meets Boots to discuss its decision not to formally recognise the union, and threatens to take its case to the statutory adjudicator if the two sides cannot reach an agreement. Boots promises to give a final decision within three weeks.
April 2012
PDA Union general secretary John Murphy reveals Boots has stood by its decision not to recognise the union. He says the union will seek independent arbitration on the case from the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC).
January 2013
The CAC accepts the PDA Union's application, on the condition that at least 10% of Boots pharmacists are members of the union.
February 2013
Boots and the BPA vow to fight the CAC's ruling through a judicial review in the High Court.
January 2014
The CAC rules support is high enough among Boots employees for the PDA Union to proceed. Later that month, the High Court rules Boots has no legal obligation to formally recognise the PDA Union, but invites the union to challenge the ruling. The PDA Union claims that the decision breaches European human rights legislation.
February 2014
The CAC halts the PDA Union's application for recognition until a final legal decision is made. The PDA Union files a request with the High Court, submitting that UK employment law is a breach of European human rights.
September 2014
The High Court rules that the UK and European laws are compatible, but the judge highlights a potential new avenue for the PDA Union to go down, in the form of pushing for derecognition of the BPA.
November 2016
The PDA Union appeals against the High Court ruling in the Court of Appeal, arguing that the decision is "incompatible" with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Union should be allowed to proceed with its application for formal recognition.
February 2017
The Court of Appeal upholds the High Court decision.
July 2017
Six Boots pharmacists launch a legal challenge to "derecognise" the BPA.
Are you a Boots pharmacist currently represented by the BPA?