Layer 1

Confusion over court ruling on Pfizer's Lyrica patent

Pfizer says only branded Lyrica should be dispensed for pain-related conditions until its appeal has been heard

It is unclear whether pharmacists can go against Pfizer's wishes and dispense generic pregabalin for pain, says lawyer Jonathan Radcliffe

It is “still unclear” whether a High Court ruling means pharmacists can supply the generic version of Lyrica for pain, a lawyer has said.

The court ruling earlier this month (September 10), which found Pfizer had gone too far in enforcing its patent, could leave pharmacists in a difficult position for months, said patent law expert Jonathan Radcliffe.

Pfizer said it intends to appeal the court's decision that it was wrong to prevent the use of generic version of Lyrica, pregabalin, to treat all forms of pain. It also stressed that the court upheld its right to prevent the generic from being prescribed for certain types of pain, including acute herpetic, postherpetic and causalgia, was upheld.

Mr Radcliffe told C+D he expects Pfizer to ask the court for the full patent – which only allows the generic to be prescribed for epilepsy and anxiety disorder – to be enforced until the appeal process is completed.

“Unfortunately for pharmacists, this means [they] will still be unclear about what exactly they can do for many months to come,” said Mr Radcliffe, who is a partner at law firm Charles Russell Speechlys.

Court verdict

The High Court ruling appeared to allow pharmacists to dispense pregabalin for most forms of pain.

It found that Actavis – who brought the case to court – had not infringed the patent in regards to a range of pain-related conditions, including neuropathic and cancer pains. The judge said – as sections of the patent are invalid – no pharmacist who dispensed the generic for these conditions had violated it.

PSNC and Community Pharmacy Scotland reported last week that the ruling means pharmacists are free to dispense pregabalin when prescribed for pain.

But Pfizer told C+D that, until its appeal is heard, pharmacists should continue to follow NHS England guidance from earlier this year, which said patients with neuropathic pain should be supplied with Lyrica “as far as reasonably possible”.
 

"Amounting to threats"

The judge was critical of Pfizer's enforcement of its Lyrica patent. Some of Pfizer’s “extensive steps” to prevent generic pregabalin being prescribed and dispensed – which included a letter to superintendent pharmacists in December – “amounted to threats”, the court found.

The manufacturer told C+D that “with the benefit of hindsight” it wishes it had explained the situation “better and sooner”. “Our intention was only ever to communicate the existence and importance of our second medical use patent for the use of Lyrica in pain, and nothing more,” it said.

Pfizer UK's medical director Berkeley Phillips said the "absence of any national policy or framework for second medical use patents in the UK has been a cause of concern and confusion for many, including us".

Concluding the ruling, the judge called for a “centralised and authoritative" system to keep healthcare professionals informed about whether to prescribe a generic version of a drug or a patented, branded version. “Prescribers cannot be expected to know when this is required, nor should they be required to take steps to find out,” he added.

Click here to read the High Court judgment in full.

 

Have you found it hard to adhere to the Lyrica prescribing restrictions?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

9 Comments

Matthew Edwards, Community pharmacist

Since Pfizer have reportedly paid the GP surgeries for inconvenience in searching and dealing with this at the point of prescribing surely pharmacy would not be held accountable if the wrong version is given.

Z ZZzzzz, Information Technology

There is no such thing as giving the wrong version, despite what Pfizer insist on telling everyone. Read the judgement.

Dodo pharmacist, Community pharmacist

So what the hell do we do now?

Z ZZzzzz, Information Technology

Whatever you want. Pfizer are not going to take anyone to court. It is all bluff and bluster. They will not want the adverse publicity when it I seen that Pfizer's bullying is costing the NHS money that could be better spent.

Bal Singh, Locum pharmacist

Let's face reality. What are the psnc going to pay for reimbursement in the drug tariff for pregabalin now?

Neeraj Salwan, Superintendent Pharmacist

I'm sure Pfizers with these latest actions, makes us Pharmacists love them even more- NOT!

London Locum, Locum pharmacist

If they have balls they should sue the multiples if the opportunity arises. Suing a mere pharmacist amounts to pulling wings off a fly.

Dave Downham, Manager

As soon as Pfizer sue a pharmacist, then we'll be scared. Go on then, big boy, put up or shut up!

Z ZZzzzz, Information Technology

I put it to everyone that Pfizer's threats are nothing more than hot air. I guess the judge agrees. Read the judgement and make up your own mind. NHSE are chickening out from giving up to date advice.

Job of the week

Pharmacist Manager
Wrexham , North Wales
Great Salary & Bonus.