Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Boots' union claims 'insufficient' support for PDA challenge

Boots’ union has claimed there is “not sufficient” evidence to suggest most of its pharmacists want to be represented by the Pharmacists’ Defence Association (PDA) Union.

Six Boots pharmacists launched a legal challenge last month to have their pay, hours and holiday collectively negotiated by the PDA Union. The challenge was delivered to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) – the independent body responsible for resolving workplace disputes – on July 28.

Both Boots and its union, the Boots Pharmacists’ Association (BPA), were invited by the CAC to respond to the legal challenge.

In a statement to C+D yesterday (August 16), the BPA said in its opinion “the evidence presented [by the PDA Union] is not sufficient, as it is largely based on historic pledges of support for recognition of the PDA Union, and not de-recognition of the BPA”.

The PDA has been calling on Boots pharmacists to support its challenge on its website, since the Union launched proceedings.

However, “no evidence of the outputs of this activity has been shared with the BPA at this stage”, Boots' union told C+D.

The BPA copied its response to the CAC panel to “inform their decision”, it said.

“We are proud of our many achievements over the years, that have been to the benefit of our members and Boots pharmacists in general,” it added. “The support we have given to our members will continue throughout this process.”

Boots’ response to CAC

Boots told C+D on Tuesday (August 15) that the multiple had written to all its pharmacists to confirm it “does not support the de-recognition of the BPA”.

“We respect the right of all colleagues to become members of a trade body of their choice. However, we have always believed that [through] our ways of working and engaging…we have the best opportunity to engage with each individual pharmacist across Boots, ensuring everyone has a voice,” it said.

The BPA's “intimate knowledge” of the business means it has been “challenging, informative and constructive” over the 40-year partnership, which “has made a big difference to our pharmacists and our business as a whole”, Boots said.

“The formal relationship we have is uniquely placed to help us into the future,” it added.

Announcing the legal challenge last month, PDA Union general secretary John Murphy said “the individuals taking this action are representative of many thousands of Boots pharmacists who have been frustrated by their employer’s actions”.

For a timeline of the Boots and PDA saga from 2012 to 2017, click here

What should unions offer their pharmacist members?

Related Content

Topics

         
Registrant member of the Assurance and Appointments Committee 
Nationwide
£ Renumeration

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD008896

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel